Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 78/05
Hearing date 10 May 2005 - 12 May 2005 (2 days)
Determination date 16 June 2005
Member J Crichton
Representation PC Butler ; JS Fairclough
Location Christchurch
Parties Miller v Michael Pearcy Investments Ltd t/a Field Maple
Summary JURISDICTION - Whether independent contractor or employee - Applicant and respondent were in negotiations with the intention of an employment relationship resulting - Applicant alleged agreement concluded, she started work, and was an employee - Respondent alleged, though he intended there to be an employment relationship, one was not yet concluded and the relationship was an independent contractor one at termination of the contract - Applicant created a wage book and entered her wages into it - PAYE was retained by respondent and not paid to IRD - Classic case of parties talking past each other - Matter reasonably finely balanced - Employment relationship evidenced by memorandum documenting proposed arrangement by applicant, letter by respondent referring to agreed terms, and the applicant commencing work, completing the appropriate IRD form and setting up a wages book - Respondent indicated intention to be bound and in fact became bound as consequence of applicant's attendance at work and her behaviour in assisting to create an employment relationship - PAYE due and owing and respondent directed to attend to that as a matter of urgency and provide evidence of having done so to applicant's representative
Result Application granted ; Directions accordingly ; Costs reserved
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: ca 78_05.pdf [pdf 34 KB]