| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 79/05 |
| Hearing date | 26 May 2005 |
| Determination date | 27 May 2005 |
| Member | H Doyle |
| Representation | G Stanescu (in person) ; RE Knapp |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Stanescu v Sparks |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Identity of employer - Applicant named respondent as employer in arrears claim - Respondent alleged applicant's employer was company (BIL") which respondent was director of - Unsigned employment agreement named employer as BIL - Respondent as director of and on behalf of BIL offered applicant employment - Applicant aware of BIL and accepted BIL probably paid his wages - Name BIL was on applicant's business cards - Authority satisfied that BIL rather than respondent was applicant's employer" |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 79_05.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |