| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 88/05 |
| Hearing date | 27 May 2005 |
| Determination date | 27 May 2005 |
| Member | P R Stapp |
| Representation | M Banfield ; J Langford |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Hunt Development and Construction Ltd v Hickey |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Applicant sought that respondent return its company property - Parties consented to following arrangements at investigation meeting - Respondent was to return saw and drill - Cell phone handed over at meeting - Respondent agreed to photocopy his diary for applicant - Applicant was to check for nail gun and both parties were to check for cell phone charger - No remaining issue about apprenticeship documents or money - COSTS - Applicant sought reasonable costs - Matter for modest costs only - Contribution of $150 plus disbursements appropriate |
| Result | Orders accordingly ; Costs in favour of applicant ($150) ; Disbursements ($70)(filing fee) |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | wa 88_05.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |