| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 162/01 |
| Determination date | 23 October 2001 |
| Member | S Bathgate |
| Representation | P Cole ; P Swarbick |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Abood v Woolworths Auckland (NZ) Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Poor performance - Failed to meet required standard as outlined in job description - Given number of warnings regarding performance issues - Failed to improve performance - Procedural requirements met - Dismissal substantively justified and procedurally fair - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Alleged request for pay rise caused harassment and warnings - Alleged problems with performance illusory - Failed to accept warnings and criticism - Performance concerns real - Warnings justified - Night fill captain |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |