| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 165/01 |
| Determination date | 24 October 2001 |
| Member | J Wilson |
| Representation | P Wicks ; J Latimer |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Keys v Real Estate Institute Of New Zealand |
| Summary | INTERIM INJUNCTION - Application for interim reinstatement - Unjustified disadvantage proceedings - Redundancy - Undertaking to place applicant on garden leave pending substantive determination - Disputed whether genuinely redundant - Arguable case - Adequate alternative to go on garden leave - Whether deprived of right to work - Whether absence from workplace would be detrimental - Reinstatement likely to result in confusion - Undertaking given - Short time to substantive hearing - Balance of convenience favoured not granting reinstatement - Chief executive officer |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Statutes | ERA s127;ERA s127(2) |
| Cases Cited | Madar v P&O Services (NZ) Ltd [1999] 2 ERNZ 115;Palmer v Westpac Banking Corporation unreported, Goddard CJ, 23 July 1996, WEC 45/96 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |