Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 260/05
Hearing date 23 Mar 2005
Determination date 15 July 2005
Member K J Anderson
Representation MR Ihaia (Applicant in person) ; M Hammond, C McGregor
Location Auckland
Parties Ihaia v Te Wananga O Aotearoa
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Respondent received letter of complaint from student alleging students were recorded as graduates when course requirements had not been met - Investigation into allegations uncovered irregularities in attendance records associated with students taught by applicant - Applicant acknowledged some students had not met attendance requirements but adamant that deserved to graduate - Respondent dismissed applicant for serious misconduct including ignoring its directives, making decisions without prior approval, and intentionally misleading respondent - Following dismissal parties attended so-called mediation meeting" - Respondent believed settlement had been reached but applicant pursued personal grievance - Meeting was not mediation and oral agreement was not mediated settlement - Applicant chose to breach agreement which relieved respondent of further obligation - Whether dismissal justified - Applicant knew or should have known what was required of students - Fair and reasonable investigation - Dismissal justified - ARREARS OF WAGES - Applicant alleged expenses due and owing - Respondent's practice to reimburse legitimate expenses but process had to be followed - Applicant gave no evidence steps had been followed - No evidence of entitlement to expenses - Claim declined - Tutor"
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s5;ERA s147;ERA s148;ERA s149
Cases Cited Airline Stewards and Hostesses of NZ IUOW v Air New Zealand Ltd [1990] 3 NZLR 549;Northern Distribution Union v BP Oil NZ Ltd [1992] 3 ERNZ 483
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: aa 260_05.pdf [pdf 40 KB]