| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 265/05 |
| Hearing date | 7 Apr 2005 |
| Determination date | 13 July 2005 |
| Member | D King |
| Representation | R Williams ; K Laird |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Baker and Anor v Cardinal Health N.Z. 217 Ltd |
| Other Parties | Johnstone |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Interpretation and application of incentive scheme in employment agreement - Parties' annual performance incentive scheme based on 60 percent weighting for sales revenue and 40 percent weighting for personal objectives - Respondent's interpretation of incentive scheme correct - Applicants' argument really about how incentive scheme implemented - Applicants alleged that if had known they could over-achieve on objectives, they would have written their objectives so could be overachieved - Applicants aware of criteria and specifically that over-achievement was possible on personal objectives as well as sales - Applicants correctly paid |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 265_05.pdf [pdf 17 KB] |