| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 129/05 |
| Determination date | 27 September 2005 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | T Corrigan ; B Dorking |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Langford and Ors v Otago District Health Board |
| Other Parties | Jenkins, Nicol, Webster |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Interim determination - Agreed that would issue interim determination and if no request from either party to hear further argument, decision would become final one by effluxion of time - Applicants alleged respondent had failed to pay shoe allowance which was due and owing pursuant to collective agreement - Collective agreement required allowance where staff required to wear particular type of shoe - Only told to wear closed footwear - Not instruction to wear particular type of shoe - General directions lacked degree of particularity that clause contemplated |
| Result | Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 129_05.pdf [pdf 19 KB] |