| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 149/05 |
| Hearing date | 14 Sep 2005 |
| Determination date | 22 November 2005 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | A Smith (in person) ; O Apinelu (in person) |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Smith v Apinelu |
| Summary | JURISDICTION - Applicant alleged was owed wages for two month period - Respondent denied was employment relationship - Alleged claim activated by malice since he and applicant had previously been in domestic relationship and he was now with someone else - No documentary evidence that was employment relationship - No oral evidence other than from parties - Not persuaded applicant made out her case that there was an employment relationship - COSTS - Costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs to lie where they fall |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 149_05.pdf [pdf 10 KB] |