| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 59A/05 |
| Determination date | 21 December 2005 |
| Member | M Urlich |
| Representation | J Duckworth ; D France |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Kirkham v Metro Motors Holdings 2003 Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Respondent had filed application to reopen two Authority determinations - Respondent had not filed any evidence pursuant to revised timetable - Had fair opportunity to do so - No explanation provided for not meeting second timetable - Appropriate for Authority to move to determine application - Application for reopening declined |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 1 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |