| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 6/06 |
| Determination date | 13 January 2006 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | H Russ ; K Stretton |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Green v Marexim Export-Import Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Authority previously determined costs against applicant - Mistakenly believed both parties had made submissions on costs issue - In interests of justice that part of investigation relating to costs be reopened for purpose of considering applicant's submissions - COSTS - Unsuccessful unjustified dismissal claim and application to raise unjustified disadvantage claim out of time - Length of investigation meeting not specified - Applicant alleged costs should lie where they fall - Allegations about respondent's evidence at investigation meeting - Nothing to indicate that any matters complained of added to applicant's costs in sense they should be reflected in order for costs - Applicant alleged he had made a Calderbank offer - Calderbank letters province of respondents, not applicants, and applicant was losing party - Conclusion on costs had not changed from original determination - Costs in favour of respondent |
| Result | Orders accordingly ; Costs in favour of respondent ($2,200) |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 6_06.pdf [pdf 12 KB] |