| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 35/06 |
| Determination date | 13 February 2006 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | S Mitchell ; M Sharp |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Nee Nee and Ors v TLNZ Auckland Ltd |
| Other Parties | Allen, Moa, Ripley, Pene, Lekasa |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Applicants applied for removal of matter to Employment Court - Respondent consented to removal - In prior dispute proceedings Authority determined that redundancies proposed by respondent were within scope of redundancy clause in employment agreements - Respondent subsequently made applicants redundant - Applicants challenged determination to Court and brought personal grievances in Authority - If challenge succeeded it would follow that dismissals unjustified - Court already had before it proceedings which were between same parties and which involved same or similar issues - Removal ordered |
| Result | Application granted ; Removal ordered ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | ERA s178(2)(c) |
| Cases Cited | TLNZ Auckland Ltd v Allen & Ors unreported, V Campbell, 22 December 2005, AA 494/05 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 35_06.pdf [pdf 9 KB] |