| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 96/06 |
| Hearing date | 29 Mar 2006 |
| Determination date | 29 March 2006 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | T Bakewell (in person) ; J Marsh |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Bakewell v Burns & Ferrall |
| Summary | ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY AND RECOVERY OF MONIES - Applicant sought eight days wages - Applicant gave four weeks notice of resignation and worked for nearly three of the four weeks notice - When eight days remained of notice period applicant was told if you want to you can go now we no longer need you" - Respondent regarded applicant as taking annual leave for those eight days - Applicant not ordered or directed not to come to work for those eight days - Could have attended the office till his last day of notice if he wished - Claim rejected - Was incomplete information before Authority about alleged commission owing and alleged overpayment to applicant - Claim suspended to allow sharing of information between parties" |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Orders accordingly ; No order for cost |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 96_06.pdf [pdf 11 KB] |