Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 125/06
Hearing date 28 Feb 2006
Determination date 11 April 2006
Member V Campbell
Representation P Officer ; no appearance
Location Auckland
Parties LJS Employment Ltd v Matthews
Summary BREACH OF CONTRACT – Application for recovery of training bond and one month’s pay in lieu of notice – No appearance for respondent - Employment agreement required forfeiture of one month’s pay if correct notice not given - Respondent resigned on one month’s notice – Worked part of notice period then failed to return to work – No explanation for absence – Forfeiture clause effective as genuine pre-estimate of loss in absence of proper notice – Applicable even though clause contemplated situation where no notice given at all – However, recovery not to be out of proportion with loss actually suffered – Fair to require payment of one month’s notice less days actually worked during notice period – Amount owing to be offset by holiday pay withheld by applicant in breach of Wages Protection Act 1983 (“WPA”) – Normal on-the-job training received by respondent standard part of employing new staff - Training bond not recoverable as amounted to “premium” payable for employment of worker prohibited by WPA s12A – Fish and chip shop trainee manager
Result Application granted (Payment in lieu of notice) ; Application dismissed (Training bond) ; Damages ($1,218.78)(14 days wages less $167.22 holiday pay withheld by applicant) ; No order for costs ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee)
Statutes ERA Second Schedule;Wages Protection Act 1983 s4;Wages Protection Act 1983 s5;Wages Protection Act 1983 s12A
Cases Cited Mehta v Elliot (Labour Inspector) [2003] 1 ERNZ 451;Ozturk v Gultekin (t/a Halikarnas Restaurant) [2004] 1 ERNZ 572;Sears v A-G (in respect of the Controller and Auditor-General, Audit Department) [1994] 2 ERNZ 39
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: aa 125_06.pdf [pdf 24 KB]