| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 9A/06 |
| Determination date | 26 April 2006 |
| Member | D Asher |
| Representation | D McLeod ; J Hannan |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Tamarua v Toll NZ Consolidated Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Applicant challenged Authority's determinations to Employment Court - Applied for stay of Authority's costs determination against him - Respondent opposed application for stay - If respondent successful on challenge it would not be injuriously affected by stay because it was company of some means and substance - If applicant successful on challenge he would be injuriously affected by having to pay costs that at present he said he could not afford - Stay ordered - Leave granted to respondent to return to Authority in event it was of view that applicant in breach of his undertaking to diligently pursue challenge |
| Result | Application granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | ERA s179 |
| Cases Cited | New Zealand Post Primary Teachers' Association v Attorney-General (on behalf of Ministry of Education) (No 3) [1991] 3 ERNZ 708 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | wa 9a_06.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |