| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 67/01 |
| Determination date | 10 December 2001 |
| Member | N Taylor |
| Representation | A McKenzie ; P Montgomery ; P Shaw |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Hoskin v Advanced Personnel Services Ltd |
| Other Parties | Canterbury District Health Board |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application by second respondent to be removed as party to substantive proceedings - Central claim of substantive case based on second respondent being applicant's employer - Application for removal went to heart of substantive claim - Amounted to strike out application - Wrong to remove second respondent without hearing substantive case - Striking out was only to be exercised in rarest of circumstances and not in a summary manner - No evidence that claim frivolous or vexatious - Application declined |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |