| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 82/06 |
| Determination date | 06 June 2006 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | J Henning (in person) ; no appearance |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Labour Inspector (Henning) v Danseys Pass Coach Inn Ltd |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER - Compliance with demand notice sought - No appearance for respondent despite fact director of respondent had spoken to Senior Support Officer of Authority and confirmed money was owing and proposed payment by instalments - Satisfied demand notice properly served on respondent - Respondent did not lodge objection to demand notice - As respondent had not exercised its right to object, nor had it met obligations by paying sums referred to in demand notice, directed that respondent comply with demand notice within 14 days - $1,461 owing - Amount owing to be split evenly and to be directly made available to two specified employees - COSTS - Costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Compliance ordered ; Costs to lie where they fall |
| Statutes | ERA s137;ERA s224;ERA s225;ERA s225(4) |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 82_06.pdf [pdf 9 KB] |