| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | WA 88/06 |
| Hearing date | 1 Jun 2006 |
| Determination date | 08 June 2006 |
| Member | P R Stapp |
| Representation | R Foitzik ; E Liew (in person) |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Li v Liew |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Identity of employer - Applicant named respondent as employer in arrears claim - Respondent alleged applicant's employer was company (WJL") which respondent was director of - Employment agreement named WJL as employer - Applicant aware of WJL - Authority satisfied that WJL rather than respondent was applicant's employer - Applicant had previously made claim for wages against WJL – Company in liquidation – Applicant did not establish misled or deceived by respondent in regard to her employment with company – Also unable to establish failed arrangement to work for other company involved any deception or misleading conduct by respondent – Office manager" |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | Fair Trading Act 1986 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | wa 88_06.pdf [pdf 12 KB] |