| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 132/06 |
| Hearing date | 24 Aug 2006 |
| Determination date | 29 August 2006 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | No appearance ; Labour Inspector (J Henning) |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | McGrath v Labour Inspector (J Henning) |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Objection by applicant to demand notice issued by Labour Inspector - No appearance by applicant - Authority dealt with objections raised by applicant - Nothing turned on absence of reference number on notice - Applicant's failure to attend meant Authority unable to consider contention employee received all monies owing - No evidence regarding allegation employee did not work appropriately - Even if evidence available, argument would need to be advanced to point failure to work impacted on basis for remuneration - Respondent’s obligation as employer existed whether or not employee subject of job subsidy - Revised calculation in demand notice reflected monies owing - Applicant directed to pay revised sum - COSTS - Costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Orders accordingly ; Costs to lie where they fall |
| Statutes | ERA s224(1);ERA s226 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 132_06.pdf [pdf 19 KB] |