Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 93/01
Determination date 21 December 2001
Member G J Wood
Representation P Bartlett ; D Woodnorth
Location Wellington
Parties Murray v Chief Executive, Inland Revenue Department
Other Parties Murray
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Correctly filled in pre-employment declaration listing no convictions - Subsequently convicted of benefit fraud - Received benefit payments while in employment with previous employer - Alleged actions brought respondent into disrepute and caused loss of trust and confidence - Code of conduct outlined serious misconduct - Suspended pending investigation - Given full opportunity to explain - Dismissal procedurally fair - No serious misconduct during employment - Requirement to protect integrity to tax system - Fraud likely to bring respondent into disrepute - Entitled to conclude irreconcilable breakdown of trust and confidence - Dismissal justified - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Alleged suspension in breach of contract - Second applicant suspended over telephone - Not given opportunity to be heard - Suspension by unknown manager caused upset - Suspension of second applicant unjustified - Customer service officers
Result Application dismissed (Unjustified dismissal) ; Application granted (Unjustified disadvantage) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,000)(Second applicant) ; Costs reserved
Statutes Social Security Act 1964;Tax Administration Act 1994 s81
Cases Cited BP Oil NZ Ltd v Northern Distribution Union [1992] 3 ERNZ 483;Reid v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [1999] 1 ERNZ 104;Tawhiwhirangi v Attorney General in respect of the Chief Executive, Department of Justice [1993] 2 ERNZ 546;Tawhiwhirangi v Attorney-General in respect of the Chief Executive, Department of Justice [1994] 1 ERNZ 459;W & H Newspapers Ltd v Oram [2000] 2 ERNZ 448
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.