Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 123A/06
Hearing date 8 Aug 2006
Determination date 01 November 2006
Member M Urlich
Representation D Bruce ; D Jacobsen
Location Auckland
Parties Watt v RD Managh Ltd t/a Odin's Marine
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application to reopen investigation - Authority had found applicant unjustifiably dismissed and awarded remedies - Respondent sought to reopen investigation in relation to Authority's findings and award of lost wages - Payment of lost wages already stayed - With parties consent, Authority requested information from ACC and Ministry of Social Development regarding applicant's receipt of compensation and benefits - Relevant information as to applicant's actual loss not made available to Authority during original investigation - Miscarriage of justice would occur if application not granted - Wages earned deducted from claim - Receipt of ACC did not sever period within which reimbursement could be claimed, rather, it created hiatus - Reimbursement period recommenced once worker stopped receiving ACC - Authority rejected submission ACC entitlement should be treated as WINZ benefit recoverable from award of damages - Period applicant on ACC removed from claim period - Declined to reopen investigation on grounds failure to mitigate loss denied applicant any award of lost wages - Satisfied original investigation considered issue of mitigation - Whether discretion exercised appropriately not matter for reopening application but one more properly brought by way of challenge - Authority to determine costs for substantive and reopening applications together - Respondent invited to file costs submission in relation to personal grievance
Result Application granted in part ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s128(2);ERA Second Schedule cl4
Cases Cited Watt v R. D. Managh Ltd t/a Odin's Marine unreported, K Anderson, 11 April 2006, AA 123/06
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: aa 123a_06.pdf [pdf 22 KB]