| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 337/06 |
| Hearing date | 3 Nov 2006 |
| Determination date | 03 November 2006 |
| Member | L Robinson |
| Representation | E Iosua (in person) ; no appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Iosua v Morgan & Anor |
| Other Parties | Iroam Thoroughbred Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - No appearance by either respondent - When contacted by Support Officer, first respondent claimed forgot about investigation meeting but wanted to attend and had people lined up" - Suggested investigation meeting be reconvened later - Initially Authority did not consider either respondent had "good cause" for failing to attend and proceeded to act fully in matter as if they had attended - Identity of employer - Applicant's employment agreement clearly disclosed second respondent was employer - Second respondent "struck off" companies register - Accordingly there was no second respondent and it could not attend - Applicant remained aggrieved and indicated intention to investigate company matters further - Investigation suspended - Applicant to advise Authority of intentions by given date or investigation would be concluded and file closed - First respondent to be served with determination - Second respondent struck out" |
| Result | Orders accordingly ; No order for costs |
| Statutes | Companies Act 1993 s319;ERA s221(a);ERA Second Schedule cl12 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 337_06.pdf [pdf 20 KB] |