| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 23A/06 |
| Hearing date | 10 Oct 2006 |
| Determination date | 10 November 2006 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | K Rowell ; S Cook |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Unsuccessful application for stay of costs determination - Applicant had filed challenge to Authority determination and sought stay of determination on costs due to inability to pay - Respondent submitted no grounds for stay and filed documentation questioning applicant's inability to pay - Applicant failed to respond and obtained de facto stay - Costs application expressly concerned with application for stay - Respondent sought costs of $2,882 - Cost application had no merit - Would have resulted in different approach to application for stay - Matter not to be visited on applicant in costs - Respondent had not informed Authority of alleged of settlement |
| Result | Application dismissed |
| Cases Cited | Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd, RA Monaghan, 7 Feb 2006, AA 23/06;Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd, RA Monaghan, 4 Oct 2005, AA 393/05;Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd, Colgan CJ [2006] 1 ERNZ 848 |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 23a_06.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |