Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 345/06
Hearing date 17 Oct 2006
Determination date 15 November 2006
Member R A Monaghan
Representation N Carter ; P Tremewan
Location Auckland
Parties Paterson v Max G Ltd t/a New World Remuera
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant’s personal relationship with respondent’s director and shareholder ended – Alleged made redundant because pursuing legal remedies under Property (Relationships) Act 1976 – Genuine redundancy but decision to act prompted by applicant’s threatened pursuit of legal action – Unjustified dismissal - Applicant claimed one month’s pay in lieu of notice inadequate – No agreement on redundancy provisions – Terms determined by implication – Nothing about applicant’s position justified implying notice period in excess of one month – Whether circumstances of redundancy and timing (shortly before Christmas) required longer notice period as matter of fairness – Reality of Christmas shutdown period in New Zealand is still that applicant’s chance of obtaining work during middle two weeks of December, to start on or before notional one month’s notice period ended in early January, was probably low – In that kind of redundancy situation extra four week cushion by way of notice would have been fair – Remedies – Entitled to further four weeks pay in lieu of notice -
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($3,040)(4 weeks) ; Compensation for lost benefit (Grocery allowance)($2,000) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($4,000) ; Costs reserved
Statutes Property (Relationships) Act 1976
Cases Cited Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin [1998] 1 ERNZ 601; [1998] 3 NZLR 276;Charta Packaging Ltd v Howard [2002] 1 ERNZ 10;Joyce v Mutual Rental Cars Ltd [1990] 3 NZELC 97,669
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: aa 345_06.pdf [pdf 38 KB]