Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 4/02
Determination date 16 January 2002
Member P R Stapp
Representation P Cole ; R Wurster
Location Auckland
Parties Port v Call Stratum Pty Ltd
Other Parties Richter, Dawson
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Summarily dismissed after communication contract terminated - Accused of being disloyal - Jurisdiction - Whether third applicant an employee or contractor - Wages paid according to invoice - Intention to be contractor - Real nature of relationship was that of employment - Required to follow instructions under supervision - Performed same tasks as employees of respondent - Third applicant an employee - Whether bonus due and owing to first applicant - No written terms for payment - Bonus conditional on communication contract and performance - No legitimate claim for bonus - Whether dismissals justified - Treated unfairly - Failed to give notice of redundancy - Had plenty of warning and opportunity to discuss notice and options - Details of disloyalty not put to applicants - Dismissals procedurally unfair and unjustified - ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY - Accountant not available for investigation meeting - Conceded second applicant's evidence could be relied on - Wages and holiday pay due and owing - PENALTY - Inappropriate to order penalty - Telephone account managers
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($800)(First applicant)(Notice) ; ($1,600)(Second applicant)(Notice) ; ($1,600)(Third applicant)(Notice) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,500)(First applicant) ; ($3,500)(Second applicant) ; ($3,500)(Third applicant) ; Arrears of wages ($1,245.34)(First applicant) ; ($200)(Second applicant) ; ($960)(Third applicant) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($600)(First applicant) ; Interest (4.88 percent) ; Costs in favour of applicants ($1,140)
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.