Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 12/02
Determination date 24 January 2002
Member G J Wood
Representation G Ogilvie ; D Anderson
Location Wellington
Parties Scott v Tantastique Beauty Complex Unisex Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Misconduct - Whether dismissed or resigned - No written employment agreement - Told respondent at pre-employment interview that he was fully qualified and had no criminal convictions - Employed on trial basis - Trial extended twice due to concerns with tidiness of salon - Swore at respondent after requested to mop floor - Became aware of applicant's criminal convictions and that not fully qualified - Resigned after allegations of deceit put to applicant - Credibility - Evidence of respondent's witnesses preferred - No dismissal - PENALTY - No penalty for failing to provide reasons for dismissal - No penalty for failure to provide time and wage records - No specific prejudice caused to applicant - Penalty awarded for failure to provide written employment agreement - Blatant breach of Employment Relations Act 2000 - Hairdresser
Result Application granted in part ; Penalty ($500)(Crown) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s64;ERA s65;ERA s67;ERA s130
Cases Cited Nelson Air Ltd v New Zealand Airline Pilots Association [1994] 2 ERNZ 665
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.