Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 148/07
Hearing date 15 Feb 2007
Determination date 16 May 2007
Member D King
Representation T Lupi (in person) ; M Ryan
Location Auckland
Parties Lupi v We Want You Motor Group Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive dismissal - Applicant transferred to new location - Alleged promised would be assistant to General Manager (“GM”) - Alleged hostility by GM, demoted to salesman, and managerial responsibilities removed - GM dismissed by Director and went to work for competitor - Applicant raised concerns about perceived demotion and other issues - Director had assumed applicant was happy as had not raised concerns previously - At end of meeting to discuss issues, applicant threatened to take respondent to court - Applicant’s behaviour deteriorated following meeting, given formal written warning - Applicant requested mediation but then resigned and went to work for same competitor as GM - Applicant solicited former colleagues to work at competitor - Authority did not accept applicant's account of transfer of location or promise of position - Given subsequent conduct could not accept evidence of poor relationship with GM - No dismissal or disadvantage - ARREARS OF WAGES - Claimed owed commission and bonus - Respondent had practice of lending potential buyers deposit to obtain finance, commission not paid to salesperson until loan recouped - Agreement did not provide commission could be withheld on that basis - Any payments withheld owing - Bonus payments discretionary - No bonus owed - Employees charged penalty fee if failed to lock up - Deductions unauthorised, to be refunded - Salesman
Result Applications dismissed (Unjustified dismissal, unjustified disadvantage) ; Application granted (Arrears of wages) ; Arrears of wages (Quantum to be determined) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Number of Pages 4
PDF File Link: aa 148_07.pdf [pdf 28 KB]