| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 11A/07 |
| Hearing date | 2 Nov 2006 |
| Determination date | 02 July 2007 |
| Member | M Urlich |
| Representation | M Young ; S Sharma |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Barry v Anoop Investments Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Supplementary determination regarding quantum of remedies - Authority had ordered reimbursement of lost wages - Parties unable to agree on calculation - Respondent's version of calculation fairly reflected agreement between parties - Holiday pay to be calculated on outstanding sum - COSTS - Investigation meeting less than one day - Applicant sought contribution of $6,000 to total costs of over $9,000, plus disbursements - Respondent sought fair contribution to costs incurred of $7,000 - Submitted had to defend unmeritorious claims - Appropriate to award $2,000 costs to applicant |
| Result | Orders accordingly ; Costs in favour of applicant ($2,000) |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Cases Cited | PBO Ltd(formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 11a_07.pdf [pdf 19 KB] |