Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No CA 80/07
Hearing date 23 Apr 2007, 27 Apr 2007, 7 Jun 2007, 11 Jun 2007
Determination date 16 July 2007
Member H Doyle
Representation P Lawson ; S Hornsby-Geluk
Location Christchurch
Parties Southern Local Government Officers Union Inc v Christchurch City Council
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application by respondent for removal to Employment Court – Applicant opposed application – Employment relationship problem involved partial lockout by respondent of applicant union’s members – Applicant sought orders lockout unlawful under s86 Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA"), wages and compensation - Respondent counterclaimed members unlawfully on strike, and were no health and safety concerns sufficient to justify strike on health and safety grounds - Definition of “lockout” in s62 Employment Contracts Act 1991 included an act of an employer “wholly or partially” discontinuing employment of employees - No case law to date about effect of removing words “wholly or partially” from s82 ERA definition of lockout - Authority found important question of law arose about lawfulness of a lockout under ERA, where partial reduction in work and pay occurred – Not appropriate for Authority to determine matter, then refer question of law to Court - Although matter not of extreme urgency, in public interest question be removed – No reasons not to exercise discretion to order removal – Entire matter removed to Court"
Result Application granted ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ECA s62;ERA s82;ERA s82(1)(a)(ii);ERA s83;ERA s84;ERA s178;ERA s178(2)
Cases Cited Hanlon v International Educational Foundation [1995] 1 ERNZ 1;Transportation Auckland Corporation Ltd v Marsh [1997] ERNZ 535 (CA);Witehira v Presbyterian Support Service (Northern) [1994] 1 ERNZ 578
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: ca 80_07.pdf [pdf 38 KB]