Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 100/07
Hearing date 20 Mar 2007
Determination date 19 July 2007
Member P R Stapp
Representation S Webster ; A Drake
Location Napier
Parties Corps v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Respondent concerned about applicant's use of new inventory system - Applicant suspended while it investigated further - Applicant admitted deleting stock as had problems with new system - Respondent considered ongoing theft investigation impeded and inventory corrupted - Applicant dismissed for failing to follow company policy or act with reasonable care - Suspension unfair as applicant had no input into the decision and not on notice - Respondent unable to justify decision to dismiss for serious misconduct as applicant provided explanation that underlying performance issues existed in relation to operation of inventory system and respondent acknowledged problems with system - Fair and reasonable employer would not have dismissed applicant in circumstances, it was performance matter and should have been dealt with accordingly - Also, respondents procedure unfair and breached its HR manual, undermining its attempt to justify actions - Dismissal unjustified - Remedies - Applicant claimed dismissed so respondent could avoid paying redundancy compensation - Uncertainty meant Authority could not compensate him for loss of this potential benefit - Applicant gave evidence did not trust employers to work for one again, and had since become self employed - Inventory Controller
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($27,796)(6 months) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($18,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Cases Cited Honda NZ Ltd v NZ (with exceptions) Shipwrights etc Union [1990] 3 NZILR 23 (CA);Trotter v Telecom Corporation of NZ Ltd [1993] 2 ERNZ 659
Number of Pages 11
PDF File Link: wa 100_07.pdf [pdf 49 KB]