| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 14/02 |
| Determination date | 18 February 2002 |
| Member | N Taylor |
| Representation | C Nickalls ; R Towner |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | de Vries v Carter Holt Harvey |
| Summary | DISPUTE - Interpretation, application and operation of collective employment contract - Provision of transport discontinued - Whether term of CEC or discretionary benefit - Reasonably believed transport would be continued - Respondent's conduct misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive - Provision of transport was term of CEC - Transport unilaterally removed without negotiation - Consent required to remove provision of transport |
| Result | Application granted ; Question answered in favour of applicants ; Costs reserved |
| Statutes | ECA s2;ECA s20(3);Fair Trading Act 1986 s12 |
| Cases Cited | Alliance Freezing Co (Southland) Ltd v NZ Amalgamated Engineering etc IUOW [1989] 3 NZILR 785;New Zealand etc Electrical etc IUOW v Bonds (New Zealand) Limited [1984] ACJ 353;NID Distribution Workers IUOW v Farmers Trading Co Ltd [1988] NZILR 842;NZ Storeworkers etc IUOW v South Pacific Tyres (NZ) Ltd [1990] 3 NZILR 452;Tranz Rail Ltd v Rail & Maritime Transport Union (Inc) [1999] 1 ERNZ 460 |
| Number of Pages | 9 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |