Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 179A/07
Hearing date 15 Jun 2007
Determination date 31 July 2007
Member D King
Representation M Hollands (in person) ; no appearance
Location Auckland
Parties Hollands v Jam Marketing Pty Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Poor performance - No appearance for respondent - No written employment agreement - Earlier determination found applicant an employee - Matter determined on applicant's uncontested evidece - Applicant employed to sell timeshare properties on salary plus commission basis - Within two months told was being let go because was “a round peg in a square hole” - Not given any indication employment at risk or opportunity to comment - Manner dismissal affected brutal" - Decision predetermined - Dismissal unjustified - PENALTY - Respondent intended to provide employment agreement but failed to do so - Penalty appropriate - COSTS - Applicant entitled to costs - Applicant to forward details of expenditure incurred to Authority"
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($5,000)(10 weeks) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($8,000) ; Penalty ($3,000)(Payable to Crown)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s136(1)
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: aa 179a_07.pdf [pdf 15 KB]