| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 21/02 |
| Determination date | 06 March 2002 |
| Member | P Cheyne |
| Representation | A McKenzie ; R Gibson |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Duffield v Taymac Manufacturing Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Breach of promise - Alleged failure to allow applicant to rescind resignation - Performance concerns - Gave notice of resignation due to alleged unwarranted attention - Attempted to convince applicant to withdrawn resignation - Rescinded resignation once apology given - No authority to agree to remaining in employment - General manager refused to accept withdrawal of resignation - Opportunity to withdraw resignation given but declined - No undertaking to allow time to consider withdrawal - No breach of promise - Boilermaker |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Cases Cited | NZ Labourers etc IUOW v Hodder & Tolley Ltd [1989] 1 NZILR 431 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |