Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 392/07
Hearing date 13 Nov 2007
Determination date 13 December 2007
Member R A Monaghan
Representation C Garvey ; D Organ
Location Auckland
Parties Sminchisescu v Five Star Distribution Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Misconduct - Applicant dismissed for returning to workplace in breach of instruction not to - Incident involving staff applicant responsible for taking beer from damaged delivery - Manager began to investigate matter - Applicant suspended on pay and told not come on site until matter resolved - Later given permission to return and collect personal property, but issue arose over whether took work documents or tried to influence people involved in investigation - Respondent considered applicant removed incident report - Disciplinary meeting held regarding serious misconduct - Unclear whether misconduct referred to removal of beer or paperwork - Grounds not made clear until end of meeting when told related to failure to follow instructions - Applicant dismissed - Circumstances relating to applicant’s conduct over beer incident not unusual and did not warrant suspension - Unjustified disadvantage - Difficult for respondent to justify dismissal for failure to follow instruction associated with unjustified suspension - Overall applicant’s conduct not properly investigated and dismissal profoundly flawed - Respondent not entitled to reach conclusion it did - Dismissal unjustified - Remedies - In absence of properly completed investigation respondent could not rely on any loss of trust and confidence arising out of matters - Although at times applicant behaved in underhanded way, conduct not serious enough to base finding should not be reinstated - Supervisor
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (Quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000)(Disadvantage) ; ($3,000) (Dismissal) ; Reinstatement ordered ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Cases Cited Birss v Secretary for Justice [1983] 1 NZLR 513;Graham v Airways Corporation of New Zealand [2005] ERNZ 587
Number of Pages 21
PDF File Link: aa 392_07.pdf [pdf 62 KB]