Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 399/07
Hearing date 15 Nov 2007
Determination date 18 December 2007
Member J Scott
Representation G Ogilvie ; R Stewart
Location Hamilton
Parties Borrell-Johnson v UBP Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Misconduct - Applicant skilled employee but observance of hygiene regulations very poor - Received numerous warnings for dirty gear, including final warning - Respondent ignored next failure to pass inspection, but dismissed when also failed following week - Applicant alleged no opportunity to discuss matter - Also claimed gear met required standard - Credibility finding in favour of respondent - Applicant had cavalier attitude to strict hygiene requirements of job - Respondent entitled to rely on earlier warnings - Authority satisfied applicant failed inspection, no further investigation required other than to put concerns to applicant - Process not perfect but essence of fair procedure present - Although decision to dismiss effectively made before applicant spoken to, fair and reasonable employer would have taken same approach in circumstances - Also, clear respondent did not want to dismiss applicant and had looked for ways around its own rules to give him another chance - Had applicant offered anything in mitigation respondent would have considered it - Dismissal justified - PENALTY - Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s refusal to attend mediation - Employment agreement referred to mediation but not mandatory - Respondent also failed to comply with direction to mediation from Authority but no penalty provided for in Employment Relations Act 2000 for breach of direction to mediation - Matter to be considered in costs setting - Boner
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A
Cases Cited Air New Zealand v Hudson [2006] 1 ERNZ 415
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: aa 399_07.pdf [pdf 41 KB]