Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 10/08
Hearing date 13 Dec 2007
Determination date 25 January 2008
Member G J Wood
Representation A Millar ; S Hornsby-Geluk
Location Palmerston North
Parties Bentley v Land Transport New Zealand
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicant claimed warning for excessive use of sick leave unjustified - Entitled to nine days paid sick leave per year under collective employment agreement (“CEA”) - Policy relating to use of sick leave included process to monitor use and deal with suspected abuse or long term absence - Throughout employment applicant took more sick leave than annual paid entitlement - Respondent accepted she had genuine reasons for great use of sick leave - Policy only provided for disciplinary meetings for alleged misuse of sick leave - Applicant not accused of this - No misconduct alleged by respondent to justify warning - Applicant’s use of sick leave not at level to justify warning - Context also included provision in CEA for unpaid sick leave in excess of paid entitlement - Respondent applied sick leave policy mechanistically and individual circumstances not taken into account - Also, applicant’s reasons for use of excess sick leave such that no fair and reasonable employer would have disciplined her for abuse or misuse of sick leave - Unjustified disadvantage - Remedies - Applicant discouraged from taking leave needed to support her family, which included foster children - Also meant did not take leave when sick herself, which potentially exposed other workers to harm - Insufficient evidence to conclude warning caused her to miss out on promotion - Customer service representative
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Cases Cited Cooper v Mars New Zealand Ltd t/a Mars Pet Care unreported, D Asher, 6 December 2007, WA 163/07;Lang v Eagle Airways Ltd [1996] 1 ERNZ 574
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: wa 10_08.pdf [pdf 45 KB]