| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 26/01 |
| Determination date | 28 March 2001 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | Brine in person ; G Grant |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Brine v Pennighton t/a Touch of Gloss Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Whether redundant - Whether redundancy compensation owing - Advised projected workload was low - Offered 2 weeks' wages - Advised not yet redundant - Redundancy only imminent - Entitled to request that redundancy worked out - Departure from work was premature - Pre-empted dismissal - No dismissal by way of redundancy |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs to lie where they fall |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |