| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 1B/08 |
| Hearing date | 3 Apr 2008 |
| Determination date | 14 April 2008 |
| Member | R A Monaghan |
| Representation | T Skinner ; P Akbar |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Smith & Anor v Career Engineer Ltd |
| Other Parties | Engineering & Technical Recruitment Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Supplementary costs decision - Previous costs award in favour of respondent for $750 - Applicant submitted did not receive opportunity to respond to respondent's costs claims for breach of contract and penalties - Authority accepted timetable set in substantive determination not clear in its application - Applicant invited to file response and advised would reconsider order for costs - Took into account all submissions filed by both parties regarding costs - No reason to visit result of dispute on either party in costs relating to substantive determination - Respondent was marginally more successful party and costs reflected that - No additional relevant factual information provided by applicant for this submission - No variation to original costs order |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Smith v Career Engineer Ltd unreported, R Monaghan, 26 February 2008, AA 1A/08 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 1b_08.pdf [pdf 15 KB] |