| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 62/08 |
| Determination date | 09 May 2008 |
| Member | P Montgomery |
| Representation | D Goldwater ; C Williams |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Brewster v Pridex Industries (New Zealand) Ltd |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Respondent sought to defer Authority’s investigation into applicant’s claim until Police and Serious Fraud Office concluded investigations into alleged unlawful conduct - No charges laid against applicant - No certainty as to when investigation meeting could proceed - Applicant’s original claim lodged with three others - Splitting applicants claims would involve unnecessary costs for Authority and parties - Respondent had opportunity to raise issue earlier - Timing of application approaching vexatious - Matter to proceed as scheduled - In event applicant due remedies, those will be addressed in supplementary determination |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 62_08.pdf [pdf 16 KB] |