| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 73/08 |
| Determination date | 23 May 2008 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | P Bradford (in person) ; P Wilson |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Bradford v Tai Poutini Polytechnic |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application to strike out two matters advanced by applicant as part of personal grievance claims - Respondent submitted matters already dealt with and accused applicant of being vexatious - Applicant alleged signature forged on student assessments after marks adjusted - Subsequent independent investigation found no wrongdoing - Issue complained of by applicant part of typical academic moderation process - Authority satisfied report commissioned after applicant complained properly dealt with matter and no reason for him to be dissatisfied with outcome - Respondent paying for independent investigation not “unethical” or a “conflict of interest” as alleged by applicant - Substantive investigation meeting to exclude all reference to these matters - Tutor |
| Result | Application granted ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Personal Grievance |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 73_08.pdf [pdf 26 KB] |