Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 208/08
Hearing date 13 Jun 2008
Determination date 16 June 2008
Member M Urlich
Representation S Menzies ; M O'Neill ; S McKenna
Location Auckland
Parties Curtain Makers New Zealand v Crocombe & Ors
Other Parties Kelly, Rutherford, Henrderson, Fogarty, Carbat Ltd
Summary COSTS - Urgent interim injunction application withdrawn two days before investigation meeting - Respondents sought costs - Submitted high contribution to costs totaling $11,947 warranted as applicant abandoned application after respondents filed all evidence, and applicant's claims were speculative and unsupported - Also argued factual disputes common in injunctive settings - Applicant failed to respond to respondents offer to inspect computers - Respondent's costs unnecessarily added to - Fifth respondent sought indemnity costs of $3,500 claiming the large number of respondents increased preparatory work and abandonment of application incurring extensive costs - Applicant submitted costs should be reserved until substantive matter settled - Respondents entitled to high award of costs - Indemnity costs not warranted - First, second, third, fourth and sixth respondents entitled to $8,000 contribution to costs - Fifth respondent entitled to $2,000 contribution to costs
Result Costs in favour of respondents ($10,000)
Main Category Costs
Cases Cited AC Neilson (NZ) Ltd v Pappafloratos unreported, Shaw J, 5 September 2003, WC 17B/03;Credit Consultants Debt Services NZ Ltd v Wilson 5 April 2007 [2007] ERNZ 205;Data Group Ltd v Gillespie unreported, Travis J, 22 March 2004, AC 16/04;NZ Automotive Association v McKay [1996] 2 ERNZ 622, Colgan J;Paki v Panel Holdings Ltd unreported, Colgan CJ, 2 May 2008, AC 12/08;PBO Ltd(formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808;Sheiling Laboratories Ltd v Smith unreported, Shaw J, 6 June 1995, AEC 48/95
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: aa 208_08.pdf [pdf 31 KB]