Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 219/08
Determination date 25 June 2008
Member M Urlich
Representation S Fonua ; A Sherriff
Location Auckland
Parties Pulu v Ministry of Justice
Summary COSTS - Respondent sought contribution of $2,500 to costs associated with withdrawal of application - Respondent had made Calderbank offer prior to cancellation of application, which was rejected - Respondent advised applicant too poor" to make contribution to respondent's costs - Applicant submitted no costs award should be made due to various circumstances - Applicant's 26 years of service with respondent, serious illness applicant was suffering, belief she was unjustifiably dismissed and inability to work due to poor health and age made it impossible to pay any costs award - Respondent argued not at fault terminating respondent's employment by medical retirement, poor health unrelated to employment and no medical evidence provided to support applicant's claim she withdrew proceedings due to ill health - Authority found applicant had ample opportunity to withdraw application prior to costs being incurred - Appropriate for applicant to make some contribution to respondent costs incurred"
Result Costs in favour of respondent ($1,550)
Main Category Costs
Statutes ERA Second Schedule cl15
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: aa 219_08.pdf [pdf 16 KB]