Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 213/08
Hearing date 16 Jun 2008
Determination date 30 June 2008
Member D King
Representation A Taljaard (in person) ; T Retzlaff
Location Auckland
Parties Taljaard (Labour Inspector) v UT Investment Lts t/a Coco Hut Restaurant
Summary ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - Applicant Labour Inspector sought arrears on behalf of ML - Official record of employment less than length of actual employment - Respondent submitted lacked records because ML had resigned and been re-employed on “unofficial” basis when not able to legally continue in employment - Previously claimed ML was contractor for “unofficial” period of employment - Argument substanceless as ML did same work on same basis - “Unofficial employment” not a legal entity - ML employee for entire period - Arrears due and owing - Interest 10.64 percent - PENALTY - Respondent claimed unaware had to pay holiday pay prior to employee being employed for full year - Employer had obligation to familiarise self with relevant legislation - $2,000 penalty under s75(2)(a) Holidays Act 2003 for failure to pay - Further $2,000 penalty under s75(2)(e) Holidays Act 2003 for failure to provide holiday record - Also $2,000 penalty under ss229 (3) and (7) Employment Relations Act 2000 for failure to provide time and wage records
Result Application granted ; Arrears of holiday pay ($3,021.70) ; Interest (10.64%) ; Penalty ($6,000)(payable to Crown) ; Disbursements ($70)(Filing fee)
Main Category Arrears
Statutes ERA s228(1);ERA s229(3);ERA s229(7);Holidays Act s75(2)(a);Holidays Act s75(2)(e);Holidays Act s84(2)
Number of Pages 3
PDF File Link: aa 213_08.pdf [pdf 15 KB]