Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 123/08
Hearing date 26 Mar 2008
Determination date 01 April 2008
Member R Arthur
Representation G Hunt (in person) ; no appearance
Location Auckland
Parties Hunt & Anor v Erceg
Other Parties Graimes
Summary ARREARS OF WAGES - Two applicants lodged separate statements of problem - Authority directed matters be heard together as of same type and involved same respondent - No appearance by one applicant - No appearance for respondent - Applicant had previously worked for company respondent was director of - Respondent offered applicant work on yacht - Applicant to make own way to Australia to board yacht but return flight provided - Applicant flew to Australia and began work - Had “run in” with another employee and asked to leave - Skipper agreed, and directed applicant arrange flight back to New Zealand and contact company’s secretary to organise pay - Applicant not paid and discussions with respondent did not resolve issue - Issue of whether employer was respondent personally or respondent as representative of another party - Respondent may not have intended to employ applicant in own name, however, if acting for another party did not disclose fact to applicant - Authority found rule regarding undisclosed principal applied - Respondent applicant’s employer personally - No written employment agreement - Authority satisfied New Zealand law and Authority’s jurisdiction applied to employment relationship - Found applicant owed arrears of wages in sum of $3,200 plus interest and reimbursement for airfare in sum of $735 - Deck hand
Result Application granted ; Arrears of wages ($3,200) ; Interest (10.84%) ; Recovery of monies ($735)(Airfare) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee)
Main Category Arrears
Statutes ERA Schedule 2 cl11
Cases Cited Cuttance v Perkis [1994] 2 ERNZ 321
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: aa 123_08.pdf [pdf 24 KB]