| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 144B/08 |
| Hearing date | 20 Jun 2008 |
| Determination date | 06 August 2008 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | D Neutze, M Frogley ; P Wicks |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Temperzone Ltd v Joy |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Respondent sought to vary Authority orders following granting of mareva injunction - Respondent sought rescission of orders freezing bank accounts – Also sought rescission of order preventing dealing with properties owned by trust; administered by applicant – Authority found rescission of orders would only leave frozen respondent’s superannuation fund – Alternatively respondent sought variation allowing $150,000 to be released from frozen account – Respondent sought relief from earlier orders to pay living and legal expenses – Authority found well established legal principle party restrained by mareva injunction entitled to access sufficient funds to meet legal and living expenses – Authority found vital in this case parties not left unrepresented but had access to experienced counsel – Found experienced legal counsel would also benefit Authority – Found parties accepted variation and respondent withdrew application on preliminary issue – Authority amended earlier sealed order |
| Result | Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 144b_08.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |