Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 325/08
Hearing date 6 Aug 2008
Determination date 16 September 2008
Member M Urlich
Representation C Causer (in person) ; E Mann
Location Auckland
Parties Causer v Gleeson & Cox Transport
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal – Consistent with agreed probationary period, manager reviewed applicant’s performance in third week of employment – Review sought improvement – Applicant complained to senior managers that bullied and treated unfairly by manager - Following day applicant verbally resigned – Resignation letter stated reasons being workplace unpleasant and attempts to rectify situation had failed – Respondent argued manager critical but not abusive – Authority found close monitoring of applicant’s work during probationary period not breach of duty – Found manager had reasonable basis to raise issues with applicant in performance review – Manager gruff and to the point, but manner not unfair or derogatory and in circumstances did not amount to breach of duty – Found strongest aspect of claim was that confidential complaint to senior managers unfairly disclosed to manager – However, no clear evidence that confidence was breached or that applicant aware of breach – Found no breach of duty – If wrong, Authority also not satisfied that any breach so serious as to give rise to substantial risk of resignation – Applicant raised concerns for first time at meeting with senior managers - Found applicant did not say was considering resigning, and did not wait to receive response before resignation – No unjustified dismissal - Yard supervisor
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Cases Cited Auckland Electric Power Board v Auckland Provincial District Local Authorities Officers IUOW [1994] 1 ERNZ 168;Auckland Shop Employees IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] ACJ 963
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: aa 325_08.pdf [pdf 33 KB]