| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 160/08 |
| Hearing date | 23 Oct 2008 |
| Determination date | 23 October 2008 |
| Member | P Cheyne |
| Representation | Z ; G Davenport |
| Location | Blenheim |
| Parties | The Applicant v The Respondent |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Authority made order prohibiting from publication identities of applicant, respondent, and applicant’s advocate – Applicant suspended from employment pending respondent’s disciplinary investigation into alleged trust and confidence issues – Applicant sought orders revoking suspension and declaration respondent’s disciplinary investigation void – Claimed suspension unjustified disadvantage and breached good faith – Authority found not sufficient time to explain reasons for conclusion because of respondent’s deadline – Authority found would not make any orders restricting or restraining respondent from continuing disciplinary investigation – Authority did not decide applicant did not have personal grievance nor whether breaches to justify dismissal – Authority concluded was situation where applicant’s proper focus should be on answering concerns raised by respondent |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Personal Grievance |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 160_08.pdf [pdf 14 KB] |