| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 156A/08 |
| Determination date | 31 October 2008 |
| Member | P Montgomery |
| Representation | M Whisker ; G Malone |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Bay Audiology Ltd v Mager and Anor |
| Other Parties | den Breems |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant sought compliance with Authority’s interim orders - Applicant claimed respondents in breach of interim orders issued by Authority and of undertakings given at close of investigation meeting - Respondents opposed application for compliance order on ground no order justified based on evidence - Authority found in light of evidence before Authority and given assurances given by the respondents to abide by interim orders Authority declined to make any further orders - Application dismissed - PENALTY - Applicant sought penalty for breach of interim orders and undertakings - Application dismissed - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Applicant sought disclosure of range of documents and any client records held by respondents - Authority found application for disclosure put respondents on notice prior to substantive hearing - Found disclosure issue and attendant matters could be canvassed in course of teleconference - Application dismissed |
| Result | Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Number of Pages | 2 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 156a_08.pdf [pdf 14 KB] |