| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | CA 42/02 |
| Determination date | 18 April 2002 |
| Member | P Cheyne |
| Representation | H Evans ; M Thomas |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Miller v Red Bull New Zealand Ltd |
| Summary | INTERIM INJUNCTION - Application for interim reinstatement - Unjustified dismissal claim - Respondent alleged non-renewal of fixed term contract - Under s66 Employment Relations Act 2000 arguable case to answer - No question of contributory conduct - Reinstatement might have over staffed respondent but not factor for denial of order - Interim reinstatement granted - Brands ambassador |
| Result | Application granted ; Interim reinstatement ordered ; Costs reserved |
| Statutes | ERA s3(a)(ii);ERA s3(a)(iv);ERA s60(a);ERA s66;ERA s66(2)(a);ERA s66(2)(b);ERA s127 |
| Cases Cited | Actors' Industrial Union v Auckland Theatre Trust [1989] 2 NZLR 154;Clentworth v Technic NZ Ltd [1998] 3 ERNZ 1121;Lunjevich v Attorney General in respect of the Department of Corrections unreported, D King, 21 August 2001, AA 114/01;Principal of Auckland College of Education v Hagg [1997] ERNZ 116;Terry v East Sussex County Council [1977] 1 All ER 567;Vice-Chancellor, University of Canterbury v Purchas [1998] 3 ERNZ 925 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | ca 42_02.pdf [pdf 45 KB] |