| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 46/09 |
| Hearing date | 11 Feb 2009 |
| Determination date | 13 February 2009 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | K Single ; no appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Lelieveld v Tir Na Nog Enterprises Ltd and Ors |
| Other Parties | Cox, Cox (nee Morrison) |
| Summary | COMPLIANCE ORDER – No appearance for respondent – Applicant sought compliance with determination AA 331/08 – Respondent advised Authority not interested in responding and no intention of paying amounts owed – Compliance ordered - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought liability of second (“G”) and third (“R”) respondents as directors and shareholders – Authority found no employment relationship between applicant and R and G – No orders made against R and G personally - COSTS – Applicant entitled to $350 contribution to costs, plus filing fee |
| Result | Compliance ordered ; Application dismissed (recovery against second and third respondents) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($350) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(filing fee) |
| Main Category | Compliance Order |
| Statutes | Companies Act s97;Companies Act s131;ERA s137;ERA s140(6);ERA s161 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | aa 46_09.pdf [pdf 18 KB] |